![]() | Clinical UM Guideline |
| Subject: | Neuromuscular Stimulation in the Treatment of Muscle Atrophy | ||
| Guideline #: | CG-DME-03 | Current Effective Date: | 10/12/2011 |
| Status: | Reviewed | Last Review Date: | 08/18/2011 |
| Description |
Neuromuscular stimulation (also known as neuromuscular electrical stimulation or NMES) is the application of electrical stimulation that is used for the treatment of muscular atrophy when the nerve supply to the muscle is intact.
Note: Please see the following related document(s) for additional information:
| Clinical Indications |
Medically Necessary:
FDA approved neuromuscular stimulator devices are considered medically necessary when prescribed for the following indications when muscular atrophy is present in the setting of an intact nerve supply to the muscle, including brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves:
Not Medically Necessary:
Neuromuscular stimulation is considered not medically necessary for:
| Coding |
The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this document are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.
| HCPCS | |
| E0731 | Form-fitting conductive garment for delivery of TENS or NMES (with conductive fibers separated from the patient's skin by layers of fabric) |
| E0745 | Neuromuscular stimulator, electronic shock unit |
| ICD-9 Diagnosis | |
| All diagnoses | |
| Discussion/General Information |
When subjected to insufficient exercise, muscles atrophy, resulting in a loss of strength and mass. This process may occur as a result of immobilizing limbs after injury or surgery. Neuromuscular stimulation (also known as neuromuscular electrical stimulation or NMES) is a technique that uses electrical currents that stimulate the motor nerves, generating muscle contractions in order to reverse muscle atrophy. When nerve innervation is intact, NMES promotes re-innervation, retards the development of disuse atrophy, relaxes muscle spasms and promotes voluntary muscle control for individuals who have lost muscle function. The intensity and frequency of stimulation can vary based on the level of muscular function and response to treatment.
Clinical trials for NMES are in progress for other applications such as muscle atrophy secondary to severe chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), muscle strengthening for cerebral palsy and stroke, quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement and reversing muscle atrophy in rheumatoid arthritis as well as the use of NMES for circulation.
Broderick and colleagues (2010) studied the impact of bedrest on decreased circulation. They proposed that lack of activation of the calf muscle pump during this resting period gives rise to venous stasis which may lead to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) development. A pilot study was conducted to investigate the effects that 4 hours of bed rest had on the lower limb hemodynamics of healthy subjects and to what extent, if any, electrically elicited contractions of the calf muscles can alleviate these effects. Measurements included popliteal vein blood flow and heart rate in 2 groups—one without stimulation and one with stimulation. The resting group without stimulation experienced a significant decline in popliteal venous blood flow of approximately 47% with approximately 13% decrease in heart rate while the stimulated group maintained a significantly higher venous blood flow and heart rate. The authors proposed that electrically elicited calf muscle contractions significantly improve lower limb blood flow and can alleviate some debilitating effects of bed rest. Further randomized studies are needed to substantiate this pilot study.
In another study, Palmieri-Smith and colleagues reported whether NMES is capable of improving quadriceps muscle strength and activation in women with mild and moderate knee osteoarthritis. Thirty women with radiographic, not symptomatic, knee osteoarthritis were randomized into 2 groups—treatment and no treatment. Those in the intervention group received NMES 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The effects of NMES on quadriceps muscle strength were evaluated at one and twelve weeks after treatment completion. No improvements in muscle strength were seen in the treatment group. Muscle strength were similar across both control and treatment groups. Limitations of the study were that it was not blinded and that osteoarthritis was based on radiographic evidence alone, exclusive of symptoms.
To investigate the long-term efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in enhancing motor recovery in the upper extremities of those post stroke, Lin and colleagues (2011) conducted a study of 46 stroke subjects randomized into a NMES treatment group or a control group. All subjects participated in a standard rehabilitation program. Those in the NMES group received neuromuscular electrical stimulation for 30 min, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Measurements were recorded before treatment, at the 2nd and 3rd week of treatment and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment ended. The Modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity, the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer motor assessment, and the Modified Barthel Index were used to assess the results. Significant improvements were found in both groups and persisted 1 month after treatment had been discontinued. At 3 and 6 months after treatment was discontinued the average scores in the neuromuscular electrical stimulation group were significantly better than those in the control group. The authors acknowledged the limitations of the study were its small size and lack of a sham group with blinding. They concluded that additional studies, using similar stimulation protocols with a larger sample, are needed to gain further insight into the value of NMES to restore functionality after stroke.
| References |
Peer Reviewed Publications:
Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:
| Index |
Disuse Atrophy
Muscle Atrophy
Neuromuscular Stimulation
| History |
| Status | Date | Action |
| Reviewed | 08/18/2011 | Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. No change to criteria. Coding, Discussion/General Information and References updated. |
| Reviewed | 08/19/2010 | MPTAC review. No change to criteria. Place of Service deleted. Background and References updated. |
| Reviewed | 08/27/2009 | MPTAC review. References updated. |
| Reviewed | 08/28/2008 | MPTAC review. References updated. |
| Reviewed | 08/23/2007 | MPTAC review. References updated. |
| Revised | 09/14/2006 | MPTAC review. Revision addressed use of neuromuscular stimulation garment. References updated. |
| Reviewed | 06/08/2006 | MPTAC review. References and coding updated. |
| 11/22/2005 | Added reference for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) – National Coverage Determination (NCD). | |
| Revised | 07/14/2005 | MPTAC review. Revision based on Pre-merger Anthem and Pre-merger WellPoint Harmonization. |
| Pre-Merger Organizations | Last Review Date | Document Number | Title |
| Anthem, Inc. | N/A | ||
| Anthem BCBS | N/A | ||
| WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. | 06/24/2004 | None | Neuromuscular Stimulation in the Treatment of Muscle Atrophy |