| Clinical UM Guideline |
| Subject: Surgical Strabismus Correction | |
| Guideline #: CG-SURG-41 | Publish Date: 01/06/2026 |
| Status: Reviewed | Last Review Date: 11/06/2025 |
| Description |
This document addresses strabismus, which refers to eyes that are not properly aligned. Examples of strabismus include one or both eyes that are intermittently or constantly turned in towards the nose (esotropia) or out (exotropia). Strabismus surgery involves surgical weakening or strengthening of the ocular muscles to correct the ocular alignment. The goals of strabismus surgery are to restore or reconstruct normal ocular alignment, obtain normal visual acuity in each eye, obtain or improve fusion, eliminate any associated sensory adaptations or diplopia, and to improve visual fields.
Note: The use of botulinum toxin is not addressed in this document. For related information, please refer to the guidelines used by the plan.
| Clinical Indications |
Medically Necessary:
Adults
Surgical strabismus correction for individuals 18 years of age or older is considered medically necessary for any of the following:
Pediatrics
Surgical strabismus correction in individuals less than 18 years of age is considered medically necessary for any of the following:
Not Medically Necessary:
Surgical strabismus correction is considered not medically necessary when the criteria listed above are not met and for all other indications.
| Coding |
The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this guideline are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.
When services may be Medically Necessary when criteria are met:
| CPT |
|
| 67311 |
Strabismus surgery, recession or resection procedure; 1 horizontal muscle |
| 67312 |
Strabismus surgery, recession or resection procedure; 2 horizontal muscles |
| 67314 |
Strabismus surgery, recession or resection procedure; 1 vertical muscle (excluding superior oblique) |
| 67316 |
Strabismus surgery, recession or resection procedure; 2 or more vertical muscles (excluding superior oblique) |
| 67318 |
Strabismus surgery, any procedure, superior oblique muscle |
| 67320 |
Transposition procedure (eg, for paretic extraocular muscle), any extraocular muscle |
| 67331 |
Strabismus surgery on patient with previous eye surgery or injury that did not involve the extraocular muscles |
| 67332 |
Strabismus surgery on patient with scarring of extraocular muscles (eg, prior ocular injury, strabismus or retinal detachment surgery) or restrictive myopathy (eg, dysthyroid ophthalmopathy) |
| 67334 |
Strabismus surgery by posterior fixation suture technique, with or without muscle recession |
| 67335 |
Placement of adjustable suture(s) during strabismus surgery, including postoperative adjustment(s) of suture(s) |
| 67340 |
Strabismus surgery involving exploration and/or repair of detached extraocular muscle(s) |
|
|
|
| ICD-10 Procedure |
|
| 08BL0ZZ |
Excision of right extraocular muscle, open approach |
| 08BL3ZZ |
Excision of right extraocular muscle, percutaneous approach |
| 08BM0ZZ |
Excision of left extraocular muscle, open approach |
| 08BM3ZZ |
Excision of left extraocular muscle, percutaneous approach |
| 08QL0ZZ |
Repair right extraocular muscle, open approach |
| 08QL3ZZ |
Repair right extraocular muscle, percutaneous approach |
| 08QM0ZZ |
Repair left extraocular muscle, open approach |
| 08QM3ZZ |
Repair left extraocular muscle, percutaneous approach |
| 08SL0ZZ |
Reposition right extraocular muscle, open approach |
| 08SL3ZZ |
Reposition right extraocular muscle, percutaneous approach |
| 08SM0ZZ |
Reposition left extraocular muscle, open approach |
| 08SM3ZZ |
Reposition left extraocular muscle, percutaneous approach |
|
|
|
| ICD-10 Diagnosis |
|
|
|
All diagnoses |
When services are Not Medically Necessary:
For the procedure codes listed above when criteria are not met or for situations designated in the Clinical Indications section as not medically necessary.
| Discussion/General Information |
Summary
The primary goals of strabismus surgery are functional, aiming to restore ocular alignment, improve or establish binocular vision, and alleviate debilitating symptoms such as diplopia. In adults, this principle is supported by long-standing professional guidelines and reinforced by recent evidence showing substantial success in resolving diplopia and improving quality of life, including in very elderly populations where safety and efficacy are critical. In children, the emphasis is on the timely development of normal binocular vision and prevention of long-term sensory deficits. Multiple studies support early surgical alignment to maximize the potential for fusion, with high success rates demonstrated in common conditions such as intermittent exotropia. Importantly, large-scale registry data indicate that in cases of strabismic amblyopia, surgery does not provide additional visual acuity benefit beyond standard amblyopia therapy, reinforcing that pediatric surgical indications are appropriately directed at restoring alignment and binocular function rather than acuity gains.
Discussion
Adults
In 2017, the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) updated the Adult Strabismus Surgery joint policy statement Adult Strabismus Surgery. The indications for surgical intervention for adults with strabismus to restore and reconstruct normal ocular alignment include:
Strabismus is abnormal binocular alignment; adult strabismus surgery aims to restore or reconstruct normal ocular alignment. Indications for surgical intervention include:
Common etiologies in adults include diabetes, thyroid or Graves disease, myasthenia gravis, brain tumor, head trauma, and stroke. Adults with a history of childhood strabismus may develop diplopia after visual maturation if the direction or magnitude of deviation changes. Surgical realignment can relieve diplopia and visual confusion, restore fusion and depth perception, expand the visual field in esotropia, reduce abnormal head posture, and improve psychosocial and mental health outcomes (AAPOS/AAO, 2017).
Liebermann and colleagues (2014) reported improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the Adult Strabismus 20 (AS-20) questionnaire. This retrospective review focused on non-diplopic adults that had childhood onset strabismus and had corrective surgery with pre- and post-AS-20 results available. Statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) in 9 out of 10 function-related questions were noted. The authors noted these results suggest function-related benefits for adults who had surgical strabismus surgery. However, the limitations of the study include the small number of participants (n=20) who met inclusion criteria, and the retrospective approach. The authors noted ongoing study of HRQOL in adults with surgical correction for strabismus is needed to verify their results.
The AAO states in the preferred practice pattern guideline Adult Strabismus (Dagi, 2024) that the goal of adult strabismus surgery is to optimize an individual’s functional visual status while also addressing psychosocial concerns. The potential benefits of adult strabismus surgery include the following:
Regarding strabismus surgery in adults, the AAO (Dagi, 2024) notes that:
Success rates depend on the subpopulation studied and the goals of surgery, but overall they are approximately 80% after one procedure and may exceed 95% if a second procedure is performed on eyes failing the first intervention. . . . Patients should be informed that surgical success rates vary widely depending on the type of strabismus, number of dysfunctional muscles, previous ocular and strabismus surgery, orbital or hardware involvement, and associated systemic and neurological conditions.
Finally, Yehezkeli (2025) reported the results of a 10‑year cohort of 165 patients aged 80 to 94 years. They reported that diplopia was the presenting indication in 94% and was resolved in 75% of study participants after the first procedure and in 87% after up to two additional procedures. With a 13% reoperation rate, no intraoperative anesthesia or surgical complications were noted. Additionally, marked reductions in prism dependence and measurable gains in stereopsis were reported. Most cases were performed with topical or local anesthesia and the mean American Society of Anesthesiologists class was 2.6. They concluded that octogenarians derive substantial functional benefit from surgery with acceptable surgical risk.
Pediatrics
The development of binocularity is the goal in children, especially the very young. Evidence suggests that early alignment of the eyes in young children may improve the prognosis for binocular vision. The American Optometric Association (AOA, 2012) reported for children with infantile esotropia, “Achieving binocular alignment early in life (before age 2 years) to within 10 prism diopters of orthotropia increases the likelihood of achieving binocularity.” The AAO (2012) notes acquired esotropia occurs more frequently than infantile esotropia, and those with “Early onset acquired esotropia are more likely to require extraocular muscle surgery despite correction of their refractive error with eyeglasses.” Prompt surgical realignment in individuals with decompensated accommodative esotropia appears to improve the quality of stereopsis. Early surgery is indicated for those with constant infantile-onset exotropia to improve sensory outcomes. Likewise, the AAO notes in the preferred practice pattern guideline Esotropia and Exotropia (2022) that “There is evidence that early surgical correction improves sensory outcomes for infantile esotropia, probably because the duration of constant esotropia is minimized.”
An updated Cochrane systematic review (Mehner, 2023) identified two randomized trials. One trial found surgery may yield higher short-term alignment success than botulinum toxin for large-angle infantile esotropia, but the certainty of evidence was very low and minor complications were more frequent with botulinum toxin. A second trial found no important difference between unilateral and bilateral surgery. High-quality randomized data on optimal timing remain lacking; observational data suggest earlier alignment may improve gross stereopsis but at the cost of higher reoperation rates. Decisions on timing should consider the individual's ocular and neurologic status, as well as family preferences.
The AOA notes in the preferred practice pattern guideline Esotropia and Exotropia (2012) there are multiple factors involved in the timing and urgency for surgical referral, including but not limited to the type of strabismus; age of the child; and the likelihood of improving fusion. Children with infantile strabismus requiring surgical correction should ideally undergo surgery prior to 2 years of age. Development of binocularity with limited stereopsis have been demonstrated in studies when surgery is performed at an early age and when the duration of ocular misalignment has not been extensive.
There are multiple modalities utilized to address esotropia and exotropia, which may include (AAO, 2012):
Eleven studies satisfied the eligibility criteria of a systematic review of the treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia. Seven studies compared unilateral to bilateral resection. Four studies compared surgical to non-surgical interventions. While surgical interventions appeared to be more effective than non-surgical interventions in improving the angle of deviation, the authors note that the studies were of limited extent and quality with heterogeneous outcomes assessments and timeframes (Joyce, 2015).
Management strategies for intermittent exotropia include both surgical and non-surgical approaches. A 2021 Cochrane systematic review analyzing six randomized controlled trials (N=890) provided updated evidence on these interventions (Pang, 2021). High-certainty evidence demonstrated that part-time patching is superior to active observation for improving motor alignment at six months in children aged 12 months to 10 years. Regarding surgical techniques, moderate-certainty evidence from a large RCT indicated little difference in motor alignment outcomes at three years when comparing bilateral lateral rectus recession with unilateral recession-resection for basic-type intermittent exotropia. In a study by Lino (2025), bilateral lateral rectus recession for intermittent exotropia produced a 92.2% success rate at six months when success required residual deviation of 10 prism diopters or less plus stereopsis of 80 arcseconds or better; smaller preoperative deviation angle strongly predicted success, while sex, age, subtype, and preoperative occlusion were not independent predictors after adjustment, underscoring preoperative angle as the key planning variable
Hoehn (2025) reported that in children with strabismic amblyopia, registry data show that visual acuity improves over time with amblyopia treatment irrespective of whether strabismus surgery is performed before or within six months of diagnosis; surgery conferred no additional acuity benefit at 6, 12, or 24 months across age strata, and did not hinder treatment efficacy, which supports policy language that pediatric surgical indications target alignment, fusion, and functional binocular outcomes rather than acuity gains.
| Definitions |
Amblyopia: Vision in one of the eyes is reduced because the eye and the brain are not working together properly. The eye itself looks normal, but it is not being used normally because the brain is favoring the other eye. This condition is also sometimes called lazy eye.
Asthenopia: Eye strain or fatigue.
Binocular: Referring to the use of both eyes.
Diplopia: Double vision.
Hypertropia: A classification of strabismus with the eye turning in an upward direction.
Hypotropia: A classification of strabismus with the eye turning in a downward direction.
Orthotropia: The absence of strabismus.
Prism diopter: The customary unit of measurement of the magnitude of deviation of the visual axes in strabismus. One prism diopter is the angle subtended by a deviation of 1 centimeter at a distance of 1 meter.
| References |
Peer Reviewed Publications:
Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:
| Websites for Additional Information |
| Index |
Strabismus
The use of specific product names is illustrative only. It is not intended to be a recommendation of one product over another, and is not intended to represent a complete listing of all products available.
| History |
| Status |
Date |
Action |
| Reviewed |
11/06/2025 |
Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. Revised Description, Discussion/General Information, References and Websites for Additional Information sections. |
| Reviewed |
11/14/2024 |
MPTAC review. Revised Discussion/General Information, Definitions, References and Websites for Additional Information sections. |
| Reviewed |
11/09/2023 |
MPTAC review. Updated Discussion/General Information, References and Websites for Additional Information sections. |
| Reviewed |
11/10/2022 |
MPTAC review. Updated Discussion/General Information, Definitions, References and Websites sections. |
| Reviewed |
11/11/2021 |
MPTAC review. References were updated. |
| Reviewed |
11/05/2020 |
MPTAC review. References were updated. Reformatted Coding section. |
| Reviewed |
11/07/2019 |
MPTAC review. References were updated. |
| Reviewed |
01/24/2019 |
MPTAC review. References were updated. |
| Reviewed |
02/27/2018 |
MPTAC review. The document header wording was updated from “Current Effective Date” to “Publish Date.” Updated References section. |
| Reviewed |
02/02/2017 |
MPTAC review. Updated formatting in Clinical Indications section. Updated References and Websites sections. |
| Reviewed |
02/04/2016 |
MPTAC review. Updated Discussion, References and Websites sections. |
| Revised |
02/05/2015 |
MPTAC review. Clarified Clinical Indications. Updated Description, Discussion and References sections. |
| New |
02/13/2014 |
MPTAC review. Initial document development. |
Federal and State law, as well as contract language, and Medical Policy take precedence over Clinical UM Guidelines. We reserve the right to review and update Clinical UM Guidelines periodically. Clinical guidelines approved by the Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee are available for general adoption by plans or lines of business for consistent review of the medical necessity of services related to the clinical guideline when the plan performs utilization review for the subject. Due to variances in utilization patterns, each plan may choose whether to adopt a particular Clinical UM Guideline. To determine if review is required for this Clinical UM Guideline, please contact the customer service number on the member's card.
Alternatively, commercial or FEP plans or lines of business which determine there is not a need to adopt the guideline to review services generally across all providers delivering services to Plan’s or line of business’s members may instead use the clinical guideline for provider education and/or to review the medical necessity of services for any provider who has been notified that his/her/its claims will be reviewed for medical necessity due to billing practices or claims that are not consistent with other providers, in terms of frequency or in some other manner.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.
© CPT Only - American Medical Association